The Purdue/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer shifted course during February, declining to a reading of 134 compared to 153 a month earlier. Although the Barometer—a measure of producer sentiment based on a monthly survey of 400 U.S. agricultural producers—fell 19 points below its record high set in January, it was still the second highest reading since data collection began in fall 2015.
The two component indices of the Ag Economy Barometer, the Index of Current Conditions and the Index of Future Expectations, also backed off from their January levels. The Index of Current Conditions was 105 in February, down from 118 in January, and the Index of Future Expectations dropped 21 points from its record level of 169, set just a month earlier.
The Index of Current Conditions suggests producers feel conditions this winter are only slightly better than during the barometer’s base period of October 2015-March 2016, when the Index averaged 100. In contrast, producers are substantially more optimistic about future economic conditions than during the fall and winter of 2015-2016, as evidenced by the Index of Future Expectations remaining 48 points higher than during the base period.
The concern producers expressed about current economic conditions is consistent with other measures of conditions in the farm economy. For example, during its recent annual Agricultural Outlook Forum, USDA projected net farm income in 2017 will fall 9% below 2016’s to $62 billion, which would be 50% below the peak net farm income set in 2013.
Responses to individual questions on the barometer survey provide some additional clarity with respect to producers’ perspective on the farm economy. When asked about the future of the overall agricultural economy, a larger share of respondents expect financially “bad times” over the next 12 months (52%) than in the next five years (42%), suggesting there is more concern about the near term than the longer-term outlook. Moreover, despite the fact that both of these measures have improved since October, it’s clear that the late-fall/early winter shift in agricultural producers’ perspective regarding economic conditions can best be described as an improvement in sentiment regarding what is still a challenging operating environment.
Periodically, producers are surveyed regarding both their expectations for farmland values in their local market and their overall perceptions about farmland as an investment. February’s survey responses indicate a small improvement in sentiment since last fall as fewer producers expect farmland values to decline, and more producers expect values to increase, than when producers were last surveyed about farmland values in October 2016.
In a separate question, producers were asked to rate farmland as an investment. In February 2017, 64% of respondents rated farmland favorably as an investment, up from 52% in November 2016 and 55% a year earlier.
The February survey included two questions on agricultural trade. Producers were asked to rank how important agricultural exports are for the U.S. agricultural economy. Over half of survey respondents reported that ag exports were “very important” to the U.S. agricultural economy and 93% reported that ag exports were important. Drilling down further, producers were also asked to rate the importance of agricultural exports to their farming operations. Over 40% of respondents indicated agricultural exports were “very important” and nearly 80% of respondents said ag exports were important to their own farming operation.
Producers were asked whether they expected corn or soybeans to be more profitable in 2017. One-third of respondents reported corn would be more profitable in 2017, while two-thirds of respondents indicated they expect soybeans to be more profitable this year. These results suggest there will be even more interest than usual in USDA’s Planting Intentions report, which will be released on March 31, 2017.
Source: James Mintert, David Widmar, Michael Langemeier, Purdue